What is the difference between magenta and photo magenta

Yes the printers wihtout PC and PM do a very good job in print quality. Bob P. Re: To answer your question.. Q on cart capacity. The CLI carts have a narrow transparent section that allows you to see the ink level.

Apotheker wrote: Why? F Forum M My threads. Latest sample galleries. Tamron mm F2. Panasonic S 35mm F1. DJI Mavic 3 Cine sample gallery. Nikon Z9 pre-production sample gallery. See more galleries ». Latest in-depth reviews. Read more reviews ». Latest buying guides. Best video cameras for photographers in Best cameras for Instagram in Best drones in Best cameras for vlogging in Check out more buying guides ».

Nikon Z9 initial review. Sony a7 IV initial review. Nikon Nikkor Z mm F2. Sigma mm F Discover more challenges ». Nikon Z9 4. Popular interchangable lens cameras ». Popular compact cameras ».

Shedding some light on the sources of noise. Most bookmarked in this forum. Mobile site. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited. Threaded view. Irridescent forks by microsurgeon from Cutlery. Advice on new printer after years with Epson Marketing says Oh and by the way So what!! Isnt that why we are paying all those support folks over in Bangalore??

Default EasyPhoto settings do not give you the best output that each printer is capable of, and so the comparison is not valid IMO. Actually six color printing has been outdoing four color for a while and has always been considered superior. The canon i was the first four color printer that could compete with six color printers, in fact it uses technology to simulate a six color printer. Six color printing is superior and the i does a great job of simulating it.

I suspect that the i was under development long before the i was completed. While I imagine that they are quite happy with the success of the i, they had no way of knowing it was going to work so well and of course continued development of the i You don't think that they would spend a fortune developing it and not release it do you.

If nothing else they just released it to recoup their development costs. The i does produce beter results too, even if it is by a very small margin. The i also has slightlly beter black production because it actually uses black ink in photos rather than composite black. Don't get me wrong, I would not give up my i even if someone offered me a new i in exchange. I doubt it was some big conspiracy.

Releasing the i first in the US, and then releasing the i knowing that some of us technogadget freak Americans would buy one and then upgrade to the other was most liklly intentional. Also, if the photo colors are just dilute versions of the regular colors, why do they cost just as much? They want to beat the competition and the i is their best performing model, even if it is just marginally. They know that many photographers are going to look at the results through a loop to compare it to others so why not produce a printer that will outperform others when viewed through a loop.

They are apealing to diffrent markets. For the home user, the i is an exelent multipurpose machine. I really don't think that a true "conspiracy" exists, apparently satire falls on deaf ears occasionally!! How do you suppose they get those lighter shades?? This is true of Epson and HP and Lexmark. The photo colours are simply diluted versions of the source. For ink refillers, does this mean that one can buy only Cyan and Magenta inks and makes 4 colors from two bottles of ink and some distilled water?

Has anyone tried this? What is the persontage dilution to make Photo Cyan and Photo Magenta to match? It woudl not be easy to reproduce the photo colors by simply adding water. It's not a hoax and if you had a 12 color system with the three primary colors simply different concentrations you would have a better way of shading just as someone else posted that artists use different shades or "concentrations" of the same color to reproduce fantastic artwork.

I meant not mix well with water on that last post Kevin Davison wrote: It woudl not be easy to reproduce the photo colors by simply adding water.

Thats prety funny, I'm working on a bottle of crystal palace at the moment cheap vodka, lol. I think that most dye inkjet inks that I have dealt with at least are water soluble you could dilute it and do contain water. You could print with it. Good luck getting the perfect mixture ratio.

Also, inkjet ink, though water based, is not just water and dye. There are several other important components to the ink. It doesn't mater if you can dilute it the right amount, it will not work. Why bother though. You will go broke on photo paper long before you go broke on ink.

I think it is very resonablly priced. Experience exceptional performance and reliability by using this Canon photo magenta ink cartridge. Ad feedback. Be the first to ask a question Start typing your question. Would you like to give feedback on product content, images, or tell us about a lower price? Provide feedback. This website is intended for personal use by US residents only. See our delivery policy for full details. Copyright , Staples, Inc.

Item prices may vary from in-store prices.