Why prism is legal

And the law, as it's interpreted now, doesn't go beyond the rules of the Fourth Amendment. It's also "impressed" with the government's efforts to avoid collecting data from US citizens. It admits, however, that no matter how responsibly agencies act, the absolute scope of the program is broad.

In , the NSA collected The FBI doesn't track queries at all. This scope worried the board. While it found "no evidence of intentional abuse," it noted that the program raised privacy concerns, and that some parts "push the program close to the line of constitutional reasonableness. It wants the NSA to more clearly specify how it justifies targeting a specific person as a national security threat, and it wants tighter controls on how the FBI can use information gathered through the program.

More generally, it should evaluate how well the program weeds out data from US citizens or people within the country, conducting periodic reviews. Two members added their own statement pushing for the FISA court to be more involved in approving search terms, but two others said that even the recommendations in the larger report went too far in limiting the program.

Unsurprisingly, civil liberties groups are unpleased with the report. This ignores the fact that the government is collecting and searching through the content of millions of emails, social networking posts, and other internet communications. One of the biggest problems with the report is that it's hard to tell what the board wasn't actually allowed to see. The phone metadata program, while still heavily classified, has been more widely discussed than online surveillance, and the board notes that it had to work with the intelligence community to declassify enough documents for the review.

The only way to judge whether the program is indeed being carried out responsibly, or whether it's getting results, is by sorting through leaked and declassified documents. And while those have so far backed up the claim that the NSA rarely intentionally abuses the tool, they've also made it clear that it's sometimes been compromised by technical and organizational problems.

Meanwhile, the debate over how much American citizens are affected by the program doesn't address one of the increasingly common criticisms of the NSA: that if you're not one of the four places the USA has agreed not to spy on, there's little to stop the agency from surveilling your country. I remember seeing their platform with a consulting colleague the first time in…. Not surprising to see cloud revenue grow faster than total rev Reply on Twitter Retweet on Twitter Like on Twitter 6 Twitter Contact Details: Law Firm Service Delivery , Legal market survey featured.

Ron Friedmann , 1 year ago 6 min read Ron Friedmann , 1 year ago 3 min read Innovation and Change Management , Interesting Technology. Ron Friedmann , 1 year ago 11 min read Ron Friedmann , 1 year ago 5 min read Latest Blog Posts. Large law firms have faced growing pressure since to deliver more value to clients, creating pressure for efficiency and lower rates.

Though our groups work for many causes— freedom of the press, shared software development, universal access to knowledge, equal justice for all—our voices are responding to the same threat: the possible But the frenetic, Here are some of the biggest Since last night, the debate over how to reauthorize certain NSA surveillance authorities has seen a whirlwind of activity, culminating in the major news that the House Rules Committee postponed a vote today to potentially expand NSA spying powers.

As we wrote yesterday: "According to reports Join EFF Lists. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Upstream vs. Related Updates. Follow EFF: twitter facebook instagram youtube flicker rss.

Press Press Contact.